0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Measuring Tumor Necrosis Factor in the Peripheral Circulation of Patients With Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss FREE

Maja Svrakic, MD; Shresh Pathak, PhD; Eliot Goldofsky, MD; Ronald Hoffman, MD; Sujana S. Chandrasekhar, MD; Neil Sperling, MD; George Alexiades, MD; Matthew Ashbach, MD; Andrea Vambutas, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Drs Svrakic, Pathak, Goldofsky, Ashbach, and Vambutas); Department of Otolaryngology, New Hyde Park (Drs Pathak, Goldofsky, and Vambutas), and Department of Molecular Medicine, Feinstein Institute of Medical Research, Manhasset (Dr Vambutas), Hofstra North Shore–LIJ School of Medicine, New York; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College, New York (Drs Hoffman, Chandrasekhar, Sperling, and Alexiades); and Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York (Dr Sperling).


Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(11):1052-1058. doi:10.1001/2013.jamaoto.76.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives To characterize levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF; formerly known as tumor necrosis factor α), a well-established proinflammatory cytokine, in patients with immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss (IM-SNHL) and to determine the role of this cytokine in identifying steroid-responsive hearing loss.

Design Prospective case-control study.

Setting Tertiary care academic medical center.

Patients A total of 11 control subjects and 85 patients with clinical and audiometric characteristics of IM-SNHL (autoimmune inner ear disease and sudden SNHL combined) treated with corticosteroids were enrolled in the study. Patients were categorized as steroid responders (n = 47) and steroid nonresponders (n = 38). Peripheral venous blood was used to determine the total amount of plasma TNF by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and treated with in vitro dexamethasone. Treated and untreated PBMCs were then analyzed for release of soluble TNF protein into conditioned supernatants as well as expression of TNF messenger RNA (mRNA).

Main Outcome Measures Mean plasma levels of TNF, unstimulated and dexamethasone-stimulated PBMC-secreted levels of TNF, and TNF mRNA levels in unstimulated and dexamethasone-stimulated PBMCs.

Results Steroid nonresponders had the highest mean baseline plasma levels of TNF compared with steroid responders and control subjects (27.6, 24.1, and 14.4 pg/mL, respectively) (P = .03). For patients with IM-SNHL with a high baseline plasma levels of TNF (>14.4 pg/mL), the mean TNF secreted by PBMCs was 59.1 pg/mL, which decreased to 7.2 pg/mL with in vitro dexamethasone stimulation in the responder group, while the mean TNF secreted by PBMCs was 11.2 pg/mL, which slightly increased to 11.7 pg/mL with in vitro dexamethasone stimulation in the nonresponder group (P = .04).

Conclusions The level of TNF can be used as both a diagnostic and prognostic cytokine for IM-SNHL. For patients presenting with a sudden change in hearing threshold, a high baseline plasma TNF from the peripheral circulation is supportive of the diagnosis if it is greater than 18.8 pg/mL, with a positive predictive value higher than 97%. In addition, this study demonstrates that for patients with IM-SNHL and high plasma levels of TNF, their clinical response to oral glucocorticoids can be predicted by their in vitro PBMC response to dexamethasone. This algorithm may further guide optimal medical treatment and possibly avoid the deleterious adverse effects of administering glucocorticoids to those patients who would not benefit from their effect.

Figures in this Article

Potentially reversible idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) affects approximately 5 to 20 of 100 000 patients annually1. The exact mechanisms leading to this disorder remain poorly understood. The 2 clinical syndromes, autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED), which is usually bilateral with a relapsing-remitting pattern, and sudden SNHL, which is typically an isolated unilateral event, are thought to be immune mediated. Inciting antigens in AIED are presumably self-antigens, while those of sudden SNHL are linked to a viral illness. Irrespective of the source of antigen, AIED and sudden SNHL likely converge in a similar inflammatory cascade leading to hearing loss.

The inflammatory cytokine milieu involved in immune-mediated SNHL (IM-SNHL) has not been extensively investigated. The molecular mechanisms behind the clinically observed effect of response and regain of hearing with glucocorticoid treatment are also unknown. Various cytokines have been implicated in IM-SNHL, such as interleukin (IL)-1β,2 interferon (IFN)-γ,3 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF; formerly known as tumor necrosis factor α).4 Several clinical trials have been conducted in this patient population with immune-modulating agents such as methotrexate,5 etanercept,4,6,7 and infliximab,8 all with limited success.

Ren et al9 reported on TNF in patients with sudden SNHL and progressive SNHL in 1998. In a small study population of 15 subjects, they found that both TNF and IL-6 levels were significantly elevated in patients with sudden SNHL and progressive SNHL compared with control subjects. This was followed by a preliminary report by Rahman et al7 on administering etanercept, a well-known TNF blocker used in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, for patients with immune-mediated cochleovestibular disorders who did not respond to conventional therapies. They reported a 92% success rate (11 of 12 patients) in just hearing loss improvement with etanercept therapy. During the last decade, animal models of labyrinthitis have been used to investigate the role of TNF in recruiting inflammatory cells to the cochlea and its role in resultant hearing loss.10 While some investigators reported that, in an animal model, etanercept has a protective effect on hearing loss,11 others found it less effective than prednisone, with a greater potential for adverse effects.4,6,12

In 2 small human studies, levels of TNF in patients with sudden SNHL were found to be elevated in one study of 12 patients,13 while the other study showed that both corticosteroid-responding and nonresponding patients (total of 30 for both groups together) had lower levels of TNF than controls and concluded that this cytokine does not offer useful information in either prognosis or diagnosis of the disease.14 Likewise, the benefit of etanercept has not been consistently demonstrated. Pilot studies conducted by Matteson et al6 in 23 patients showed that only 30% improved with etanercept therapy; however, 57% experienced no improvement and 13% worsened. In a study of similar size (20 patients), Cohen et al4 failed to demonstrate any benefit of etanercept compared with placebo in maintaining hearing following benefit from corticosteroids. In 2006, Van Wijk et al8 suggested from a study of 9 patients that locally administered etanercept into the middle ear allowed patients to be tapered off corticosteroid therapy and preserve their hearing function. None of these trials examined or used TNF level as a criterion for study enrollment.

To date, this is the largest study that characterizes TNF level in the peripheral circulation of patients with IM-SNHL. The effect of in vitro administration of dexamethasone on secreted TNF in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to distinguish corticosteroid responsive patients is also investigated.

HUMAN SUBJECTS

These studies were approved by the institutional review board at the North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System and at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, and after obtaining informed consent, patients with AIED were recruited by 6 neurotologists (E.G., R.H., S.S.C., N.S., G.A., and A.V.) and had their blood drawn for PBMC isolation. Inclusion criteria were described previously15,16 and were based on the AIED serial audiometry trial inclusion criteria.17 Patients had SNHL of greater than 30 dB at 1 or more frequencies, with evidence of active decline in at least 1 ear of 15 dB at 1 frequency on their audiogram or 10 dB at 2 or more frequencies developing in more than 3 days but less than 90 days.17 If the hearing loss evolved in less than 3 days, the patient displayed features suggestive of an autoimmune disorder. All patients were demonstrated to have no evidence of retrocochlear pathologic conditions, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical response to oral glucocorticoids was defined as a 5-dB or greater average improvement at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.16 Patients with vestibular disorders in absence of hearing loss were excluded, even if they had systemic autoimmune disease. Clinical demographics of all the patients included in this study are listed in Table 1. Patients were categorized as steroid responders (n = 47) and steroid nonresponders (n = 38). Eleven healthy controls without any known autoimmune disease or history of hearing loss were included in the study for comparison with patients. The characteristics of the cohort are outlined in Table 2.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Clinical Demographic of Controls and Patients With Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Summary of Patient Characteristics
SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ISOLATION

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from patients prior to clinical corticosteroid treatment and were isolated as previously described by density centrifugation of heparinized blood (Ficoll-Paque Plus; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB).15 The upper layer of plasma was collected and stored at −20°C until immediately prior to analysis.

HUMAN PBMC CULTURE AND STIMULATION

Isolated PBMCs were washed twice with 1 × RPMI (Gibco) and incubated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (volume/volume) fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals; a single lot of fetal bovine serum was used for all experiments), 100-U/mL penicillin G sodium salt, 100-μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, and 4.1mM glutamine, and plated at 1 × 106 cells/mL in 24-well plate (Costar). A portion of the PBMCs was incubated with 4-μg/mL dexamethasone sodium phosphate (APP Pharmaceuticals), and the remainder was left untreated for 16 hours at 37°C in 5% carbon dioxide. Optimal concentration of in vitro dexamethasone that maximized dose without compromising cell viability was previously determined.15 Cell viability was measured after 16 hours and exceeded 80% in all cases. At the end of the incubation period, samples were centrifuged, and supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C. The pellets containing PBMCs were stored at −80°C until ready for use.

ELISA OF PLASMA SAMPLES AND CONDITION SUPERNATANTS

Plasma and supernatant TNF levels were quantified using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (GE Healthcare, formerly Amersham Biosciences) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Plasma and condition supernatant samples were conducted on separate plates. The sensitivity of the assay was 2.5 pg/mL. An 8-point standard curve was constructed for each assay using a quadratic fit, and data were interpolated using BioLinx 2.2 software (Synatech Laboratories Inc). All samples were run in duplicate, and the mean variance was 0.023%.

QUANTITATIVE REAL-TIME PCR OF DEXAMETHASONE-TREATED AND UNTREATED PBMCs

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the ABI 7900HT Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems); primer sequences, nucleotide position number, and gene bank accession numbers for actin and TNF gene were as described previously.15,17 Quantitative real-time PCR conditions were as follows: 30 minutes at 48°C (1 cycle), 10 minutes at 95°C (1 cycle), 15 seconds at 95°C (45 cycles), and 1 minute at 60°C (45 cycles). For all PCRs, PCR mix contained 1 × master mix and 0.125 μL of Euroscript (Eurogentec RT qPCR MasterMix; Eurogentec) + reverse transcriptase inhibitor (0.125 U/μL) and ribonuclease inhibitor (0.05 U/μL). Polymerase chain reaction was then performed using the forward and reverse primers at a final concentration of 0.5μM in a sample volume of 25 μL. Relative quantification of the PCR signals was performed by comparing the cycle threshold value, in duplicate, of the gene of interest of each sample with the cycle threshold values of the reference gene actin. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis for each sample was performed in duplicate.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data groups were analyzed either by the Mann-Whitney test or by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc testing was performed using a Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test. Two-way ANOVA was used for treatment vs patient group effect. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Graph Pad Prism v5 (GraphPad Software Inc) was used for statistical analysis.

PLASMA TNF

Plasma from the control group subjects, clinical steroid responders and steroid nonresponders was analyzed for levels of TNF by ELISA. The mean (SEM) values for the controls, responders, and nonresponders were 14.4 (1.7), 24.1 (3.7), and 27.6 (3.7) pg/mL, respectively (Table 3). The range (95% CI) of plasma TNF values for each group was 9.7 to 27.7 pg/mL (10.6-18.3 pg/mL) for controls, 8.8 to 127.9 pg/mL (16.7-31.6 pg/mL) for responders and 10.5 to 105.2 pg/mL (20.1-35.0 pg/mL) for nonresponders. Analyzing for difference in plasma TNF levels between controls and patients (responders and nonresponders together) using the Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between control and patient populations (P = .03); however, the difference between responders and nonresponders was nonsignificant (P = .08). Thus, measurement of plasma TNF in the presence of an acute decline in hearing is suggestive of IM-SNHL but is insufficient to predict response to corticosteroids.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Elevation of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Levels in Patients With Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
PBMC-SECRETED TNF

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from controls, responders, and nonresponders prior to clinical corticosteroid therapy were cultured in the presence of dexamethasone and compared with untreated cultures. The culture supernatants were analyzed for secreted TNF. Mean untreated (baseline) levels (SEM) of PBMC-secreted TNF were 10.0 (3.2), 36.1 (14.3) and 13.4 (2.0) pg/mL for controls, responders, and nonresponders, respectively (Table 4). The differences in these basal values were not found to be significant using 1-way ANOVA with Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests and the Mann-Whitney test. The 95% confidence interval for the responder group was particularly wide (6.8-65.5 pg/mL), with a range of values from 0.0 to 372.0 pg/mL of TNF.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Elevation of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level in the Supernatants of Steroid-Responsive Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
DEXAMETHASONE-TREATED PBMCs

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from controls, responders, and nonresponders were isolated and were either left untreated or treated with dexamethasone overnight. The resulting supernatants were analyzed for secreted TNF. Dexamethasone treatment of PBMCs resulted in reduced TNF secretion in all groups, as demonstrated by a mean (SEM) secretion of 10.0 (3.2) pg/mL in untreated PBMCs to 6.8 (2.4) pg/mL in dexamethasone-treated PBMCs of controls, 36.1 (14.3) pg/mL to 8.2 (1.4) pg/mL in clinical steroid responders, and 13.4 (2.0) pg/mL to 12.6 (2.1) pg/mL, for nonresponders, respectively (Table 4 and Figure 1). The differences in these values were not found to be statistically significant using 2-way ANOVA for either the population group (P = .27) or treatment (P = .15). The mean (SEM) fold change from baseline, untreated PBMC-secreted TNF was 0.73 (0.30) for the control group, 1.05 (0.37) for the responders, and 1.15 (022) for the nonresponders. These differences were not found to be statistically significant (P = .79 with 1-way ANOVA).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-secreted tumor necrosis factor (TNF): in vitro dexamethasone treatment effect. In all 3 groups, dexamethasone use decreased TNF level. The differences among patient groups (P = .27) and among treated and untreated PBMCs (P = .15) are not statistically significant. Error bars designate SEMs.

PBMCs TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH PLASMA TNF LEVELS

We separately analyzed TNF secretion in the cell culture supernatant from PBMC from patients whose plasma TNF levels were elevated (greater than the mean of the control group [>14.4 pg/mL]). There were 13 available dexamethasone–treated PBMC culture supernatants from patients from the responder group and 18 from the nonresponder group. The mean (SEM) TNF level in PBMC culture supernatants from the high plasma TNF clinical corticosteroid-responder group, was 59.1 (28.5) pg/mL in untreated PBMC supernatant, which decreased to 7.2 (2.1) pg/mL with the addition of dexamethasone. The mean (SEM) TNF level in the high plasma TNF nonresponder group untreated PBMC supernatant was 11.2 (1.6) pg/mL, which slightly increased to 11.7 (2.7) pg/mL with the addition of dexamethasone (Table 5 and Figure 2). The difference with respect to patient population was statistically significant (P = .04 with 2-way ANOVA analysis).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Patients with high plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF): effect of in vitro dexamethasone on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In vitro response of PBMCs to dexamethasone is reflected by the clinical response to oral glucocorticoids in those patients who have a high plasma levels of TNF (>14.4 pg/mL). The difference among responders and nonresponders is statistically significant (P = .04). Error bars designate SEMs.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. Patients With High Plasmaa Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Levelb
TNF mRNA IN PBMCs

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from select controls (n = 4), responders (n = 7), and nonresponders (n = 10). They were subsequently left untreated or were treated in vitro with dexamethasone, RNA isolated, and TNF transcription analyzed. The mean (SEM) total number of quantitative real-time PCR cycles (inversely proportional to the amount of mRNA present) was 29.5 (1.2), 28.4 (0.3), and 29.2 (0.2) for the control, responder, and nonresponder patient groups, respectively (data not shown). This difference was not statistically significant (P = .34, 1-way ANOVA). Glucocorticoid use decreased the amount of TNF transcribed by 0.59 (0.12)–fold, 0.49 (0.11)–fold, and 0.53 (0.10)–fold from the untreated PBMCs in control, responder, and nonresponder groups, respectively (data not shown). This glucocorticoid effect was not statistically significant for the small difference observed among the groups (P = .85). There is an obviously a discrepancy in the observed dexamethasone effect on the TNF mRNA transcription and on the TNF protein secretion, which can only be explained by a downstream event, such as posttranslational modification.

The cytokine environment that governs steroid responsiveness in patients with IM-SNHL is yet to be elucidated. Very few studies, mostly limited by small sample size, have investigated the role of TNF and its inhibitors in IM-SNHL, which is thus far inconclusive. Our study has the advantage of a large sample size and potentially important implications in both diagnostic and prognostic value of TNF in steroid-responsive IM-SNHL.

The following conclusions can be drawn from the presented data:

1. In a patient presenting with hearing loss, plasma TNF levels higher than 18.3 pg/mL may establish a diagnosis of IM-SNHL with 97% certainty (the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for control subjects; Table 6). The higher threshold for diagnosing the disease, however, comes at a cost of very low sensitivity (46.8%). Therefore, plasma TNF cannot be used as a screening test, but rather a confirmatory test in those patients who are suspected to have IM-SNHL based on their clinical presentation. Even with lowering the threshold to greater than 14.4 pg/mL (the mean value of control subjects), the sensitivity of the test is still too low for use in screening (data not shown). In a patient with suspected IM-SNHL, a peripheral venous plasma level of TNF alone cannot predict their response to corticosteroids in the ability to recover hearing, however.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 6. Specificity and Sensitivity of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level as a Diagnostic Marker for Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Lossa

2. By stratifying those patients whose plasma level of TNF is high (defined as higher than the mean of the control group [14.4 pg/mL]) the clinician could predict a patient's clinical response to corticosteroids by stimulating PBMCs with dexamethasone. If there is a reduction in TNF secretion with in vitro dexamethasone, then the patient will likely clinically respond to oral corticosteroid therapy; if there is no reduction with in vitro dexamethasone, then the oral corticosteroid therapy will likely not be of benefit (Figure 3). This is an important finding, since this algorithm could be used to spare patients the potential and even serious adverse effects of high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Prognostic algorithm of oral corticosteroid therapy based on plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). IM-SNHL indicates immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss; and PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

3. While the TNF mRNA transcription is reduced with the addition of dexamethasone to PBMCs in all 3 control groups, this effect is not seen by ELISA on circulating TNF in the plasma or on secreted by PBMCs. Likely, there is a posttranscriptional alteration of TNF expression that is not affected by glucocorticoids.

4. The presented data may offer an explanation for the weak clinical effect with etanercept for hearing restoration in this disease. In both the clinical studies by Matteson et al6 and Cohen et al,4 prior to administering etanercept, the patients were treated with oral corticosteroids. Oral corticosteroids can certainly reduce the levels of TNF in corticosteroid responders, as seen by our data. Once TNF levels are already suppressed, etanercept may no longer be able to exert a significant clinical effect on an already suppressed cytokine. Alternatively, measurement of TNF plasma and/or culture supernatant levels and treatment of only those “high expressers” may afford improved audiometric responsiveness to TNF antagonist therapies. Clearly, clinical trials correlating TNF level with clinical response would be necessary to answer this question.

While our study has the benefit of a larger group of patients, TNF level remains highly variable in patients with IM-SNHL, emphasizing that clinical IM-SNHL likely represents a spectrum of disorders mediated by different cytokines. Interestingly, TNF levels can be modulated with corticosteroids, highlighting the role of TNF in the corticosteroid-responsive subset of patients. In patients with a clinical diagnosis of IM-SNHL, although 70% are initially corticosteroid responsive, that response is lost over time: only 14% are responsive after 34 months.18 This transition to a corticosteroid-resistant phenotype is likely a result in a change in the local cytokine microenvironment. In support of this hypothesis, our laboratory has demonstrated the critical role and overexpression of IL-1β in corticosteroid-resistant IM-SNHL.15,16 This overexpression of IL-1β has formed the basis of our phase 1 clinical trial of anakinra in corticosteroid-resistant autoimmune hearing loss (NCT01267994). Our results are suggestive that TNF has a more substantial predictive role in those patients with IM-SNHL who are corticosteroid responsive and consistent with our prior results showing that IL-1β appears to dictate the events in steroid-resistant hearing loss.

In conclusion, TNF has the potential of being used as both a diagnostic marker for IM-SNHL and prognostic biomarker for corticosteroid response in this disease.

Correspondence: Andrea Vambutas, MD, Apelian Cochlear Implant Center, North Shore-LIJ Health System, 430 Lakeville Rd, New Hyde Park, NY 11042 (vambutas@nshs.edu).

Submitted for Publication: June 5, 2012; final revision received June 29, 2012; accepted July 26, 2012.

Author Contributions: Drs Svrakic and Vambutas had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Svrakic, Pathak, and Vambutas. Acquisition of data: Svrakic, Pathak, Goldofsky, Hoffman, Chandrasekhar, Sperling, Alexiades, Ashbach, and Vambutas. Analysis and interpretation of data: Svrakic, Pathak, and Vambutas. Drafting of the manuscript: Svrakic, Ashbach, and Vambutas. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pathak, Goldofsky, Hoffman, Chandrasekhar, Sperling, Alexiades, Ashbach, and Vambutas. Statistical analysis: Svrakic and Vambutas. Obtained funding: Vambutas. Administrative, technical, and material support: Pathak, Hoffman, Sperling, Ashbach, and Vambutas. Study supervision: Pathak and Vambutas.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chandrasekhar is a shareholder and board member of Scientific Development and Research Inc, a small biotech company involved in surfactant research. The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research is in the process of filing a patent for the measurement of TNF as a measure of steroid responsiveness in immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grants R21DC008894 and R21DC011827 (Dr Vambutas) and by the Merrill & Phoebe Goodman Otology Research Center.

Ruckenstein MJ. Autoimmune inner ear disease.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12(5):426-430
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Hashimoto S, Billings P, Harris JP, Firestein GS, Keithley EM. Innate immunity contributes to cochlear adaptive immune responses.  Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10(1):35-43
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lorenz RR, Solares CA, Williams P,  et al.  Interferon-gamma production to inner ear antigens by T cells from patients with autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss.  J Neuroimmunol. 2002;130(1-2):173-178
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Cohen S, Shoup A, Weisman MH, Harris J. Etanercept treatment for autoimmune inner ear disease: results of a pilot placebo-controlled study.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):903-907
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Harris JP, Weisman MH, Derebery JM,  et al.  Treatment of corticosteroid-responsive autoimmune inner ear disease with methotrexate: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2003;290(14):1875-1883
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Matteson EL, Choi HK, Poe DS,  et al.  Etanercept therapy for immune-mediated cochleovestibular disorders: a multi-center, open-label, pilot study.  Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(3):337-342
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rahman MU, Poe DS, Choi HK. Etanercept therapy for immune-mediated cochleovestibular disorders: preliminary results in a pilot study.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(5):619-624
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Van Wijk F, Staecker H, Keithley E, Lefebvre PP. Local perfusion of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blocker infliximab to the inner ear improves autoimmune neurosensory hearing loss.  Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(6):357-365
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ren J, Li H, Lu Y. The determinations of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 6 in serum of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss [in Chinese].  Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1998;12(7):311-313
PubMed
Keithley EM, Wang X, Barkdull GC. Tumor necrosis factor alpha can induce recruitment of inflammatory cells to the cochlea.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(6):854-859
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Wang X, Truong T, Billings PB, Harris JP, Keithley EM. Blockage of immune-mediated inner ear damage by etanercept.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(1):52-57
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lobo D, Trinidad A, García-Berrocal JR, Verdaguer JM, Ramírez-Camacho R. TNFalpha blockers do not improve the hearing recovery obtained with glucocorticoid therapy in an autoimmune experimental labyrinthitis.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(7):622-626
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Kassner SS, Schöttler S, Bonaterra GA,  et al.  Proinflammatory and proadhesive activation of lymphocytes and macrophages in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16(4):254-262
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Süslü N, Yilmaz T, Gürsel B. Utility of anti-HSP 70, TNF-alpha, ESR, antinuclear antibody, and antiphospholipid antibodies in the diagnosis and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Laryngoscope. 2009;119(2):341-346
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Pathak S, Goldofsky E, Vivas EX, Bonagura VR, Vambutas A. IL-1β is overexpressed and aberrantly regulated in corticosteroid nonresponders with autoimmune inner ear disease.  J Immunol. 2011;186(3):1870-1879
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Vambutas A, DeVoti J, Goldofsky E, Gordon M, Lesser M, Bonagura V. Alternate splicing of interleukin-1 receptor type II (IL1R2) in vitro correlates with clinical glucocorticoid responsiveness in patients with AIED.  PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5293
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Niparko JK, Wang NY, Rauch SD,  et al; AIED Study Group.  Serial audiometry in a clinical trial of AIED treatment.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):908-917
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Broughton SS, Meyerhoff WE, Cohen SB. Immune-mediated inner ear disease: 10-year experience.  Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004;34(2):544-548
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-secreted tumor necrosis factor (TNF): in vitro dexamethasone treatment effect. In all 3 groups, dexamethasone use decreased TNF level. The differences among patient groups (P = .27) and among treated and untreated PBMCs (P = .15) are not statistically significant. Error bars designate SEMs.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Patients with high plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF): effect of in vitro dexamethasone on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In vitro response of PBMCs to dexamethasone is reflected by the clinical response to oral glucocorticoids in those patients who have a high plasma levels of TNF (>14.4 pg/mL). The difference among responders and nonresponders is statistically significant (P = .04). Error bars designate SEMs.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Prognostic algorithm of oral corticosteroid therapy based on plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF). IM-SNHL indicates immune-mediated sensorineural hearing loss; and PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Clinical Demographic of Controls and Patients With Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Summary of Patient Characteristics
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Elevation of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Levels in Patients With Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Elevation of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level in the Supernatants of Steroid-Responsive Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. Patients With High Plasmaa Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Levelb
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 6. Specificity and Sensitivity of Plasma Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Level as a Diagnostic Marker for Immune-Mediated Sensorineural Hearing Lossa

References

Ruckenstein MJ. Autoimmune inner ear disease.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12(5):426-430
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Hashimoto S, Billings P, Harris JP, Firestein GS, Keithley EM. Innate immunity contributes to cochlear adaptive immune responses.  Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10(1):35-43
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lorenz RR, Solares CA, Williams P,  et al.  Interferon-gamma production to inner ear antigens by T cells from patients with autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss.  J Neuroimmunol. 2002;130(1-2):173-178
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Cohen S, Shoup A, Weisman MH, Harris J. Etanercept treatment for autoimmune inner ear disease: results of a pilot placebo-controlled study.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):903-907
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Harris JP, Weisman MH, Derebery JM,  et al.  Treatment of corticosteroid-responsive autoimmune inner ear disease with methotrexate: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2003;290(14):1875-1883
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Matteson EL, Choi HK, Poe DS,  et al.  Etanercept therapy for immune-mediated cochleovestibular disorders: a multi-center, open-label, pilot study.  Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(3):337-342
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rahman MU, Poe DS, Choi HK. Etanercept therapy for immune-mediated cochleovestibular disorders: preliminary results in a pilot study.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(5):619-624
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Van Wijk F, Staecker H, Keithley E, Lefebvre PP. Local perfusion of the tumor necrosis factor alpha blocker infliximab to the inner ear improves autoimmune neurosensory hearing loss.  Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(6):357-365
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ren J, Li H, Lu Y. The determinations of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 6 in serum of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss [in Chinese].  Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1998;12(7):311-313
PubMed
Keithley EM, Wang X, Barkdull GC. Tumor necrosis factor alpha can induce recruitment of inflammatory cells to the cochlea.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(6):854-859
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Wang X, Truong T, Billings PB, Harris JP, Keithley EM. Blockage of immune-mediated inner ear damage by etanercept.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(1):52-57
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lobo D, Trinidad A, García-Berrocal JR, Verdaguer JM, Ramírez-Camacho R. TNFalpha blockers do not improve the hearing recovery obtained with glucocorticoid therapy in an autoimmune experimental labyrinthitis.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(7):622-626
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Kassner SS, Schöttler S, Bonaterra GA,  et al.  Proinflammatory and proadhesive activation of lymphocytes and macrophages in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16(4):254-262
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Süslü N, Yilmaz T, Gürsel B. Utility of anti-HSP 70, TNF-alpha, ESR, antinuclear antibody, and antiphospholipid antibodies in the diagnosis and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.  Laryngoscope. 2009;119(2):341-346
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Pathak S, Goldofsky E, Vivas EX, Bonagura VR, Vambutas A. IL-1β is overexpressed and aberrantly regulated in corticosteroid nonresponders with autoimmune inner ear disease.  J Immunol. 2011;186(3):1870-1879
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Vambutas A, DeVoti J, Goldofsky E, Gordon M, Lesser M, Bonagura V. Alternate splicing of interleukin-1 receptor type II (IL1R2) in vitro correlates with clinical glucocorticoid responsiveness in patients with AIED.  PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5293
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Niparko JK, Wang NY, Rauch SD,  et al; AIED Study Group.  Serial audiometry in a clinical trial of AIED treatment.  Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):908-917
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Broughton SS, Meyerhoff WE, Cohen SB. Immune-mediated inner ear disease: 10-year experience.  Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004;34(2):544-548
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections