0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters to the Editor |

Nonopposing Suture Lines in Nasal Septal Perforation Repairs

Edmund A. Pribitkin, MD
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(6):657. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3380.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

I appreciate the article “A Novel Technique to Repair Moderate-sized Nasoseptal Perforations,” by Raol and Olson1; however, I must point out that the described technique is simply a modification of the procedure described by Fairbanks2 in 1980 and revisited by Kridel et al3 in 1986, Arnstein and Berke4 in 1989, and Ambro et al5 in 1993. Raol and Olson1 have omitted the inferiorly based flap on 1 side of the perforation repair—this is a common practice among surgeons repairing perforations through an open rhinoplasty approach when adequate mucoperichondrium is available to repair 1 side of the perforation from above. Raol and Olson1 note that the main advantage of the technique is the bilateral closure with nonopposing suture lines—nonopposing suture lines are a feature of the technique originally described by Fairbanks.2 Finally, Figure 4 does not accurately reflect the technique that is described for perforation closure. This illustration depicts overlapping mucoperichondrial flaps, whereas the text correctly describes flaps sutured together along their edges.

Topics

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

June 1, 2013
Nikhila Raol, MD; Krista Olson, MD
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(6):657. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3384.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

163 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();