We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary | Clinical Controversies in Otolaryngology

Zenker Diverticulum and Clinical Controversies in Otolaryngology Which Surgical Approach Is Superior?

Richard L. Scher, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(4):403-404. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3387.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Those of us trained a generation or more ago were witness to an intense effort to provide minimally invasive surgical approaches designed to reduce the adverse effects on patients, whether through miniaturization of instruments, development and implementation of endoscopes and microscopes, or advances in perioperative supportive care. Evidence that these effects have been significant across the spectrum of surgical care include examples such as endoscopic sinus surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This revolution in surgical care has likewise had an effect on other upper aerodigestive tract diseases, including Zenker diverticulum (ZD). The use of endoscopic minimally invasive techniques to treat patients with this disorder has been readily adopted and adapted by surgeons across the world, returning to the basics of Mosher’s original endoscopic treatment approach.1 In the United States, where the accepted approach was external diverticulectomy for most of the past 80-plus years, adoption of endoscopic treatment has had an especially dramatic clinical change.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Dysphagia and Odynophagia