Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Longitudinal Aspect of Case-Control Analysis—Reply FREE

David R. Friedland, MD, PhD; Christina Runge-Samuelson, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(11):1150. doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.177.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In reply

We appreciate the comments of Vogtmann and colleagues regarding our article “Case-Control Analysis of Cochlear Implant Performance in Elderly Patients.” However, we maintain that characterizing the principal component of our study as a case-control analysis, the results of which are shown in Figures 3 and 4 in our article, is appropriate, and, as such, the statistical analyses are also correct. The description of this component of the study as “longitudinal” is incorrect and may account for the suggestion that our analysis represents a cohort study. Our study measured a single outcome (speech perception) at a single time point (1 year after implantation) among patients who were stratified by elderly (case) and nonelderly (control). To ensure equivalency of initial residual hearing, these patients were retrospectively matched by 1 measure of speech perception at initial presentation. We stand by our conclusion that elderly patients do very well with cochlear implantation but that outcomes are more variable and less robust than in younger adults.


Correspondence: Dr Friedland, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (dfriedla@mcw.edu).





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.