We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters to the Editor |

Differentiating Tonsillitis From Glandular Fever: Is the Lymphocyte–White Blood Cell Count Ratio Any Help?

Emma Louise Smale, BMBCh, MRCSEd; Stephen Mcdonald, BMBCh, MRCS; Vikram Dhar, MBBS, MRCS
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(9):952. doi:10.1001/archotol.133.9.952-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We were very interested to read the article by Wolf et al1 titled “Lymphocyte–White Blood Cell Count [L/WCC] Ratio: A Quickly Available Screening Tool to Differentiate Acute Purulent Tonsillitis From Glandular Fever.” We agree that a rapidly available and cost-effective screening tool would undoubtedly be useful in the detection of glandular fever. Wolf and coauthors comment that the L/WCC ratio had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100% for the detection of glandular fever and that the “specificity and sensitivity of this test seem to be better than the mononucleosis spot test itself.” However, such a statement is misleading; the group used the Monolatex test (Biokit SA, Barcelona, Spain), one of the commercially available monospot testing kits, as their diagnostic criterion standard. The Monolatex test has a sensitivity of 93.9% and a specificity of 98.3% against viral titers for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus.2 Therefore, the test will have a number of false-positives and false-negatives and will hence render the sensitivity and specificity of the L/WCC ratio less accurate than is suggested in Wolf and colleagues' article. To get true sensitivities and specificities for the L/WCC ratio, it would be necessary to compare this ratio with Epstein-Barr virus–specific serologic tests, as suggested by the authors. We carried out a similar audit in our hospital. We looked at 100 patients who had undergone a Monolatex test. Our results showed that an L/WCC ratio of greater than 0.35 is 81.0% sensitive and 93.8% specific for the detection of a positive Monolatex test result.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.