We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology |

Gastroesophageal Reflux–Related Chronic Laryngitis: Con

Michael F. Vaezi, MD, PhD, MSc (Epi)
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(9):908-909. doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.149.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Hypothesis:Increasingly, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is suggested to cause laryngeal signs and symptoms,1often referred to as laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR). But can LPR still be said to exist in a patient who is unresponsive to aggressive therapy? What should we tell the group of patients whose symptoms or laryngeal signs do not improve under acid-suppressive therapy? Here are a few selected answers from my “learned” colleagues: (1) Patients' symptoms are most definitively still caused by LPR, and lack of response to acid suppression does not rule out reflux as the cause. (2) Intermittent acid reflux may still occur in this group causing patients' findings. (3) Acid is truly not the culprit, and pepsin is the main agent responsible. And (4) Surgical fundoplication should be attempted in the patients who do not respond to therapy. All of these suggestions assume that reflux is the symptoms' cause and never question whether the LPR diagnosis was incorrect in the first place. Should we continue to insist on reflux as the diagnosis just because we may not know what else might be the cause of patients' persistent symptom complex? I would argue that this is not good clinical care.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Michael F. Vaezi, MD, PhD,  MSc (Epi)

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Can the Clinical History Distinguish Between Organic and Functional Dyspepsia?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
What are the Results?