We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Glucocorticoid Treatment for Nasal Polyps The Use of Topical Budesonide Powder, Intramuscular Betamethasone, and Surgical Treatment

Torben Lildholdt, MD, PhD; Hans Rundcrantz, MD, PhD; Mats Bende, MD, PhD; Knud Larsen, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(6):595-600. doi:10.1001/archotol.1997.01900060037006.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Background:  The treatment of nasal polyps is Controversial, and medical treatment alone has been little investigated to our knowledge.

Objective:  To examine the efficacy of therapy using only topical budesonide powder and topical budesonide powder supplemented with surgical removal or intramuscular betamethasone.

Design:  Randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 dosages and additional treatment, if therapy failed. After 1 year, treatment with medication was stopped, and the demand for renewed treatment was monitored for another year.

Patients:  Patients with bilateral nasal polyps who demanded treatment were consecutively enrolled in a hospital outpatient clinic or specialty private practice. During a 15-month period from 1990 to 1992, a total of 126 patients entered the 2-year study.

Interventions:  In phase 1, randomized and doubleblind treatment with a topical medication, budesonide powder, 800 μg or 400 μg daily, or a placebo was given for 1 month. In phase 2, randomized and double-blind treatment with budesonide powder, 800 μ or 400 μ daily, was given. At the end of phase 1, failed therapy was supplemented by randomly assigned treatment of either surgical removal or a single injection of sustained released betamethasone. In phase 3, treatment with the medication was discontinued, and patients were monitored for another year. The time when treatment was required again was noted. The present article deals with phases 2 and 3.

Main Outcome Measures:  Patients' scores of treatment efficacy as well as symptoms and signs. Semiquantitative measurement of sense of smell and calculation of peak expiratory flow rate index based on nasal and oral peak expiratory flow.

Results:  In all outcome measures, a comparison of the data before treatment with the corresponding figures during phase 2 showed statistically significant efficacy. The clinical course was described at the end of phase 2. About 85% of the patients, including those who received additional therapy because the initial therapy failed, rated total or substantial control over the symptoms. The 2 dosages investigated showed equal results. These findings were consistent with the signs recorded and the peak expiratory flow rate index. The results of phase 3 showed that 50% of patients had demanded treatment after 4 months, while 34% managed without medication after 1 year.

Conclusions:  The clinical course in this study showed that most patients with nasal polyps do well with medical treatment. Therefore, surgery was required in few patients. However, the potential of medical treatment should be further explored in future studies.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:595-600


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.