0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Patterns of Frontobasal and Frontosinal Fractures in Children and Teenagers Relative to Developmental Stage of the Facial Skeleton FREE

Hanna Thorén, MD, DDS, PhD; Ichiro Seto, DDS; Michael Büttner, MD, DDS; Benoit Schaller, MD, DDS; Anna Liisa Suominen, MSc, DDS, PhD; Tateyuki Iizuka, MD, DDS, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki (Dr Thorén), Department of Environmental Health, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Kuopio (Dr Suominen), and Department of Public Health Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku (Dr Suominen), Finland; and Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Drs Thorén, Seto, Büttner, Schaller, and Iizuka).


Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(6):549-556. doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.87.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives  To clarify the patterns of frontobasal and frontosinal fractures in children and teenagers and to analyze whether the patterns relate to developmental stage of the facial skeleton.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  Level I trauma center in Bern, Switzerland.

Patients  Forty-three consecutive patients aged 18 years or younger with fracture of the frontal skull base.

Main Outcome Measures  Age at the time of injury and site, type, and degree of displacement among frontobasal and frontosinal fractures.

Results  The orbital roof was the most common frontobasal fracture site (86.0% [37 of 43]), and a combined lateral and central frontobasal fracture was the most common fracture type (55.8% [24 of 43]). Frontosinal fractures were observed in 46.5% of patients (20 of 43). Displacement or communitation of frontobasal fractures occurred in 46.5% of patients (20 of 43) and of frontosinal fractures in 70.0% (14 of 20). Isolated central frontobasal fractures were significantly more frequent in teenagers than in children aged 6 years or younger, but isolated lateral frontobasal fractures were significantly more frequent in children aged 6 years or younger than in teenagers (P = .02 for both). Dislocation or communition of frontosinal fractures was significantly more frequent in teenagers than in children aged 6 years or younger (P = .04).

Conclusion  Frontobasal fracture patterns are related to age, reflecting their correlation with the developmental phase of the facial skeleton, particularly size and degree of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses.

Figures in this Article

Dentoalveolar and soft-tissue injuries are the most common facial injuries in children,1 but facial bone fractures are infrequent. Many reasons for this finding exist, including the significant elasticity of bones and the fact that the youngest children in particular live in a protected environment and are not as exposed to accidents as adults. Several investigations have addressed the characteristics of facial fracture patterns in pediatric patients; the most extensive is the study published in 2008 by Imahara et al.2 The authors surveyed the US National Trauma Data Bank and identified 277 008 pediatric trauma patients, 12 739 of whom (4.6%) had facial bone fractures. They observed that fracture patterns varied with age. Cranial and centrofacial injuries were more common among toddlers and infants, but mandibular injuries were more common among teenagers. The results reflect the assertion that fracture patterns are influenced by the developmental stage of the facial skeleton. The prominence of the skull in the youngest patients predisposes them to fractures in the upper third of the face; as the mandible grows downward and forward, the risk for mandibular fractures increases. Obviously, the force of impact also affects facial fracture patterns.24

The term frontobasal fracture describes a fracture of the anterocranial base (ie, the orbital roofs and apexes, the posterior wall of the frontal sinus, the roof of the ethmoid sinus, and the walls of the sphenoid sinus). These injuries are rare in the youngest individuals. A study by Eggensperger Wymann et al5 performed at a level I trauma center responsible for treatment of these injuries revealed that annually, only approximately 5 children were diagnosed as having these fractures.

It can be assumed that the patterns of frontobasal and frontosinal fractures are related to age at the time of injury because of age-related variations in size and degree of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses. The literature contains no study that has focused on these issues, to our knowledge. Therefore, the primary objectives of our investigation were to clarify the patterns of frontobasal and frontosinal fractures in children and teenagers and to analyze whether the patterns relate to the developmental stage of the facial skeleton.

We reviewed medical records and radiographic images from 43 consecutive patients aged 18 years or younger who had been diagnosed as having fracture of the frontal skull base at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland. Inclusion criteria were fractures of the orbital roof, the posterior wall of the frontal sinus, the roof of the ethmoid sinus, or the roof or wall of the sphenoid sinus.

Sex, age, and cause of injury were recorded from the medical records of the emergency department. Also, the cause of injury was classified as high force vs non–high force. All available images, including conventional radiographic and computed tomographic images, were reviewed. Fine-section computed tomographic images were available for all 43 patients. Based on radiographic findings, the presence of frontobasal fractures, frontosinal fractures, and associated fractures of the skull and facial bones was recorded. Frontobasal fractures and frontosinal fractures were further classified, as detailed herein.

SITE AND TYPE OF FRONTOBASAL FRACTURE

The site of frontobasal fracture was noted. It was classified as the orbital roof, the posterior wall of the frontal sinus, the roof of the ethmoid sinus, or the roof or wall of the sphenoid sinus. Based on frontobasal fracture site distribution, each patient was assigned to 1 of the following fracture type groups: isolated lateral frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the orbital roof) (Figure 1), isolated central frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus, the roof of the ethmoid sinus, or the roof or wall of the sphenoid sinus [or a combination of these]) (Figure 2), or combined lateral and central frontobasal fracture (Figure 3). The presence of intracranial air also was recorded (Figures 2 and 3). In addition, based on the most severe dislocation, each fracture type was classified as nondisplaced (Figure 4), displaced (ie, a step in the fracture line) (Figure 5), or comminuted (Figure 6).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Radiographic images of isolated lateral frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the orbital roof on the left side). A, View from above. B, Front view.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Radiographic images of isolated central frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and the ethmoid roof bilaterally) with intracranial air. A, Fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus with intracranial air (view from above). B, Fractures of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus (view from above). C, Bilateral fracture of the ethmoid roof with intracranial air (front view). D, Fractures of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and ethmoid roof with intracranial air (side view).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Radiographic images of a combined lateral and central frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the orbital roof and the ethmoid sinus roof on the right side) with intracranial air. A, View from above. B, Close-up of fracture site, view from above.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Radiographic image of a nondisplaced fracture of the ethmoid sinus roof on the right (close-up of fracture site, front view).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Radiographic image of the displaced fracture of the ethmoid sinus roof on the left (view from above).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Radiographic image of comminuted bilateral fracture of the sphenoid sinus.

Graphic Jump Location
FRONTOSINAL FRACTURES

Frontosinal fractures were identified and classified as fracture of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus, fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus, or fracture of the anterior and posterior walls of the frontal sinus. Frontosinal fractures were further classified as nondisplaced or displaced (ie, a step in the fracture line or comminution).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

In the data analysis, associations were analyzed between age, site and type of frontobasal fracture, degree of displacement among frontobasal fractures, and involvement and displacement of the frontal sinus. Patients were divided into the following age groups: 0 to 6 years, 7 to 12 years, and 13 to 18 years. Statistical significance of the associations was evaluated using the χ2 test.

SEX AND AGE

Table 1 gives sex and age distributions. Twenty-nine patients (67.4%) were male, for an approximately 2:1 ratio of boys to girls. The age range was 0.4 to 18.9 years (mean age, 10.7 years). The largest age group comprised patients aged 13 to 18 years (n = 19 patients [44.2%]), followed by those aged 0 to 6 years (n = 13 patients [30.2%]) and those aged 7 to 12 years (n = 11 patients [25.5%]).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Sex and Age Distribution of 43 Patients With Frontobasal Fractures
CAUSE OF INJURY

Thirty-nine patients (90.7%) had sustained their injury due to a high-velocity force. Table 2 lists the causes of injury and how they differed among age groups. The leading causes were falls from a high place (range, 1-11 m) (17 patients [39.5%]) and motor vehicle crashes (14 patients [32.5%]). Most patients in the youngest group (10 of 13 [76.9%]) sustained their injury due to a fall from a high place. The occurrence of falls from high places decreased with older age to 3 of 19 patients (15.8%) in the oldest group. In contrast, the occurrence of motor vehicle crashes increased with older age, from 1 of 13 patients (7.7%) in the youngest group to 10 of 19 patients (52.6%) in the oldest group. The frequency of falls associated with bicycle riding also tended to increase with older age, from 0 of 13 patients in the youngest group to 3 of 19 patients (15.8%) in the oldest group.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Cause of Injury by Age Groupa
SITE OF FRONTOBASAL FRACTURE

Table 3 lists sites of frontobasal fracture by age group. The most common fracture site was the orbital roof (37 patients [86.0%]), followed by the roof of the ethmoid sinus (23 patients [53.5%]), the roof or wall of the sphenoid sinus (16 patients [37.2%]), and the posterior wall of the frontal sinus (13 patients [30.2%]). Fractures in the posterior wall of the frontal sinus occurred significantly more frequently in patients aged 13 to 18 years (10 of 19 [52.6%]) than in patients aged 0 to 6 years (1 of 13 [7.7%]) (P = .01). No statistically significant differences were observed among age groups in the occurrence of fractures in the orbital roof, the roof of the ethmoid sinus, or the roof or wall of the sphenoid sinus.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Site and Type of Frontobasal Fractures and Degree of Displacement by Age Group
TYPE OF FRONTOBASAL FRACTURE

Table 3 lists types of frontobasal fracture by age group. The most common fracture type was a combined lateral and central frontobasal fracture, observed in 24 patients (55.8%). In 9 of these patients (37.5%), the fracture was extensively bilateral, involving the central frontobasal area and both orbital roofs. Isolated lateral frontobasal fractures (ie, all unilateral orbital roof fractures) were observed in 12 patients (27.9%). Isolated central frontobasal fractures occurred in 7 patients (16.3%), with 4 of these having fractures that crossed the midline. Intracranial air was observed on the radiographic images of 27 patients (62.8%).

As summarized in Table 3, type of frontobasal fracture correlated with age group (P = .02). Isolated lateral fractures were observed more frequently in patients aged 0 to 6 years (53.9%) than in patients aged 13 to 18 years (10.5%). However, isolated central fractures were observed more frequently in patients aged 13 to 18 years (6 of 19 [31.6%]) than in those aged 0 to 6 years (1 of 13 [7.7%]). Combined lateral and central fractures were observed significantly more frequently in the older groups than in the youngest group. No statistically significant association was observed between type of frontobasal fracture and cause of injury.

Frontobasal fractures were displaced in 13 patients (30.2%) (Table 3). Patients aged 13 to 18 years had displaced and comminuted fractures more frequently than patients in the younger groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.

FRONTOSINAL FRACTURES

Twenty of 43 patients (46.5%) had frontosinal fractures. In 10 of these (50.0%), the anterior and posterior walls of the frontal sinus were fractured. Seven other patients (35.0%) had anterior wall fractures and 3 other patients (15.0%) had posterior wall fractures. Fourteen of 20 patients (70.0%) had displacement of frontosinal fractures; 6 of 20 (30.0%) had no displacement. Table 4 summarizes the association between age group and involvement and displacement of the frontal sinus. Most patients with frontosinal fractures (13 of 20 [65.0%], P = .02) and with displaced frontosinal fractures (11 of 14 [78.6%], P = .04) belonged to the oldest group.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Involvement and Displacement of the Frontal Sinus by Age Group
ASSOCIATED FRACTURES OF THE SKULL AND FACIAL BONES

Among 43 children and teenagers, 39 (90.7%) had 1 or more associated fractures of the skull or facial bones. As summarized in Table 5, most had skull (37 patients [86.0%]) or midfacial (16 patients [37.2%]) fractures, but mandibular fractures were infrequent (3 patients [7.0%]).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. Associated Fractures of the Skull and Facial Bones in 43 Children and Teenagers With Frontobasal Fracturesa

Few data have been published regarding fractures of the frontal skull base in children and teenagers. The English-language studies6,7 are essentially extended case reports in which the authors describe management and clinical course. Whatley et al8 analyzed fracture patterns in greater detail among 11 children and teenagers aged 6 to 14 years. However, the authors focused on frontosinal fractures and considered fractures of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses to be associated injuries. The lack of studies focusing on frontobasal fracture patterns in pediatric patients makes it difficult for us to compare results. Nevertheless, the aforementioned studies indicate that frontobasal fractures in children are complex injuries, a fact we could clearly prove. Thirty-nine of our patients (90.7%) sustained their injury owing to high-velocity trauma. Combined lateral and central frontobasal fractures occurred in 24 patients (55.8%), and the central frontobasal area and both sides of the orbital roof were involved in fractures among 9 patients (20.9%). Fracture displacement or communition was frequent, noted in 20 of 43 patients (46.5%).

Development of the midface (particularly the maxillary sinuses) coincides with development and eruption of the dentition.9 Therefore, to link patient age to developmental stage of the facial skeleton, we grouped patients according to eruption sequence of dentition. Age 0 to 6 years is considered the period of deciduous dentition, age 7 to 12 years makes up the first and second eruption periods, and age 13 to 18 years represents the stage of permanent dentition.10 Some significant differences in fracture patterns were observed by age group. Isolated lateral fractures occurred significantly more frequently in patients aged 0 to 6 years than in patients aged 13 to 18 years, but isolated central fractures in general and fractures of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus in particular were observed significantly more frequently in patients aged 13 to 18 years than in those aged 0 to 6 years. The fact that frontobasal injuries shift from lateral to central location with older age reflects increased size and degree of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses, supporting our hypothesis that frontobasal fracture patterns are related to the developmental stage of the facial skeleton.

Development of the sinuses has been demonstrated in a 2003 imaging study by Shah et al.11 Their observations were based on computed tomographic images of children aged 12 years or younger who were investigated for various types of pathologic facial conditions. The authors observed that the ascending order of sinus size by type during the newborn period (age range, 0-3 months) was frontal, sphenoid, maxillary, and ethmoid sinus. In particular, the frontal sinuses were minimally developed; immature frontal sinuses were observed in only 12% of children during this period. The authors noted that the frontal sinus is the least developed sinus type by the age of 12 years (the end point of their study). In a 1984 study, Brown et al12 demonstrated that development of the frontal sinus continues into puberty. Late development and pneumatization of the frontal sinus explain our finding that most patients with frontal sinus involvement were aged 13 years or older.

As demonstrated by Shah et al,11 the ethmoid sinus is the largest of the paranasal sinuses during the newborn period. Its pneumatization is most significant between age 3 and 8 years, and the ethmoid sinus reaches its maximum level of development by age 12 years. The authors showed that the sphenoid sinus undergoes significant development between age 1 and 3 years and is almost completely developed by age 12 years. Early development of these sinuses most likely explains why we found no significant differences between age groups in the occurrence of ethmoid and sphenoid fractures.

Whatley et al8 observed fracture displacement in 3 of 11 children (27.3%) with frontosinal fractures. In our study, the frequency of displacement among frontosinal fractures was much higher, noted among 14 of 20 patients (70.0%), and displacement in frontosinal fractures occurred significantly more frequently in patients 13 years or older than in those younger than 13 years. Moreover, although the difference was not statistically significant, patients aged 13 to 18 years displayed dislocated and comminuted frontobasal fractures more often than younger patients. Again, our findings reflect differences among age groups in developmental stages of the sinuses. The increase in size and degree of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses decreases the resilience of bones in these areas, predisposing the sinuses to fracture and displacement.

Orbital roof fractures were frequent among our patients. However, of note, 4 patients had pure orbital roof fractures with no associated fractures of the skull or facial bones. Fractures of the orbital roof are usually extensions of frontal or temporal skull fractures13 and occur in isolation among 2.9% of children with different types of orbital fractures.14 Most pure orbital roof fractures observed in our study occurred in children aged 0 to 6 years. Because of a lack of communication skills and poor cooperation in the youngest patients, diagnosis of these fractures may be significantly impeded, but these injuries should not go undiagnosed. Amirjamshidi et al15 described 9 children who were seen with unilateral globe protrusion 2 to 12 months after head injury. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a growing leptomeningeal cyst in the roof of the orbit among all of these children. The authors concluded, “Growing fractures of the anterior skull base may complicate the natural course of healing of any minor frontobasal injury, especially during childhood.”15(p178)

The results by Amirjamshidi et al15 underline the importance of performing fine-section CT with coronal and sagittal reconstructions among children after a high-force blow to the skull has occurred and in whom a skull fracture is observed on conventional screening radiographic imaging. Only fine-section CT enables diagnosis of any microscopic fracture lines in the region of the anterior skull base. As shown in the present study, intracranial air is frequently observed in association with pediatric frontobasal fractures, indicating dural tear and predisposing the patient to nasal cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis. It is our experience that antibiotics are frequently prescribed to prevent bacterial meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures. However, according to Ratilal et al,16 randomized controlled studies do not support prophylactic antibiotic use, regardless of evidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. However, prohibition of nose blowing for a period is indicated because of the communication between the paranasal sinuses and the intracranial space.

In conclusion, patterns of frontobasal and frontosinal fractures are age related and correlate with the developmental phase of the facial skeleton, particularly size and degree of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses. Lateral frontobasal fractures (ie, orbital roof fractures) occur frequently in children aged 0 to 6 years, but combined lateral and central frontobasal fractures and dislocated frontosinal fractures are common in teenagers.

Correspondence: Hanna Thorén, MD, DDS, PhD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, PO Box 263, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.

Submitted for Publication: October 26, 2010; final revision received January 31, 2011; accepted March 24, 2011.

Author Contributions: Dr Thorén had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Thorén and Iizuka. Acquisition of data: Thorén, Seto, Büttner, Schaller, and Suominen. Analysis and interpretation of data: Thorén and Iizuka. Drafting of the manuscript: Thorén. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Thorén, Seto, Büttner, Schaller, Suominen, and Iizuka. Statistical analysis: Suominen. Administrative, technical, and material support: Iizuka. Study supervision: Thorén and Iizuka.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Previous Presentation: This study was presented at the XX Congress of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery; September 16, 2010; Bruges, Belgium.

Gassner  RTuli  THächl  OMoreira  RUlmer  H Craniomaxillofacial trauma in children: a review of 3,385 cases with 6,060 injuries in 10 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62 (4) 399- 407
PubMed Link to Article
Imahara  SDHopper  RAWang  JRivara  FPKlein  MB Patterns and outcomes of pediatric facial fractures in the United States: a survey of the National Trauma Data Bank [published correction appears in J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(12):325]. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207 (5) 710- 716
PubMed Link to Article
Iizuka  TThorén  HAnnino  DJ  JrHallikainen  DLindqvist  C Midfacial fractures in pediatric patients: frequency, characteristics, and causes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121 (12) 1366- 1371
PubMed Link to Article
Thorén  HIizuka  THallikainen  DLindqvist  C Different patterns of mandibular fractures in children: an analysis of 220 fractures in 157 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20 (7) 292- 296
PubMed Link to Article
Eggensperger Wymann  NMHölzle  AZachariou  ZIizuka  T Pediatric craniofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66 (1) 58- 64
PubMed Link to Article
Burstein  FCohen  SHudgins  RBoydston  W Frontal basilar trauma: classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99 (5) 1314- 1323
PubMed Link to Article
Clauser  LDallera  VSarti  ETieghi  R Frontobasilar fractures in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20 (3) 168- 175
PubMed Link to Article
Whatley  WSAllison  DWChandra  RKThompson  JWBoop  FA Frontal sinus fractures in children. Laryngoscope 2005;115 (10) 1741- 1745
PubMed Link to Article
Langford  RJSgouros  SNatarajan  KNishikawa  HDover  MSHockley  AD Maxillary volume growth in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111 (5) 1591- 1597
PubMed Link to Article
Haavikko  K The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth: an orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim 1970;66 (3) 103- 170
Shah  RKDhingra  JKCarter  BLRebeiz  EE Paranasal sinus development: a radiographic study. Laryngoscope 2003;113 (2) 205- 209
PubMed Link to Article
Brown  WAMolleson  TIChinn  S Enlargement of the frontal sinus. Ann Hum Biol 1984;11 (3) 221- 226
PubMed Link to Article
Losee  JEAfifi  AJiang  S  et al.  Pediatric orbital fractures: classification, management, and early follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122 (3) 886- 897
PubMed Link to Article
Bansagi  ZCMeyer  DR Internal orbital fractures in the pediatric age group: characterization and management. Ophthalmology 2000;107 (5) 829- 836
PubMed Link to Article
Amirjamshidi  AAbbassioun  KSadeghi Tary  A Growing traumatic leptomeningeal cyst of the roof of the orbit presenting with unilateral exophthalmos. Surg Neurol 2000;54 (2) 178- 182
PubMed Link to Article
Ratilal  BCosta  JSampaio  C Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1) CD004884
PubMed

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Radiographic image of comminuted bilateral fracture of the sphenoid sinus.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Radiographic image of the displaced fracture of the ethmoid sinus roof on the left (view from above).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Radiographic image of a nondisplaced fracture of the ethmoid sinus roof on the right (close-up of fracture site, front view).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Radiographic images of a combined lateral and central frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the orbital roof and the ethmoid sinus roof on the right side) with intracranial air. A, View from above. B, Close-up of fracture site, view from above.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Radiographic images of isolated central frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and the ethmoid roof bilaterally) with intracranial air. A, Fracture of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus with intracranial air (view from above). B, Fractures of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus (view from above). C, Bilateral fracture of the ethmoid roof with intracranial air (front view). D, Fractures of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and ethmoid roof with intracranial air (side view).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Radiographic images of isolated lateral frontobasal fracture (ie, fracture of the orbital roof on the left side). A, View from above. B, Front view.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Sex and Age Distribution of 43 Patients With Frontobasal Fractures
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Cause of Injury by Age Groupa
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Site and Type of Frontobasal Fractures and Degree of Displacement by Age Group
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Involvement and Displacement of the Frontal Sinus by Age Group
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. Associated Fractures of the Skull and Facial Bones in 43 Children and Teenagers With Frontobasal Fracturesa

References

Gassner  RTuli  THächl  OMoreira  RUlmer  H Craniomaxillofacial trauma in children: a review of 3,385 cases with 6,060 injuries in 10 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62 (4) 399- 407
PubMed Link to Article
Imahara  SDHopper  RAWang  JRivara  FPKlein  MB Patterns and outcomes of pediatric facial fractures in the United States: a survey of the National Trauma Data Bank [published correction appears in J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(12):325]. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207 (5) 710- 716
PubMed Link to Article
Iizuka  TThorén  HAnnino  DJ  JrHallikainen  DLindqvist  C Midfacial fractures in pediatric patients: frequency, characteristics, and causes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121 (12) 1366- 1371
PubMed Link to Article
Thorén  HIizuka  THallikainen  DLindqvist  C Different patterns of mandibular fractures in children: an analysis of 220 fractures in 157 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20 (7) 292- 296
PubMed Link to Article
Eggensperger Wymann  NMHölzle  AZachariou  ZIizuka  T Pediatric craniofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66 (1) 58- 64
PubMed Link to Article
Burstein  FCohen  SHudgins  RBoydston  W Frontal basilar trauma: classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99 (5) 1314- 1323
PubMed Link to Article
Clauser  LDallera  VSarti  ETieghi  R Frontobasilar fractures in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2004;20 (3) 168- 175
PubMed Link to Article
Whatley  WSAllison  DWChandra  RKThompson  JWBoop  FA Frontal sinus fractures in children. Laryngoscope 2005;115 (10) 1741- 1745
PubMed Link to Article
Langford  RJSgouros  SNatarajan  KNishikawa  HDover  MSHockley  AD Maxillary volume growth in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111 (5) 1591- 1597
PubMed Link to Article
Haavikko  K The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth: an orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim 1970;66 (3) 103- 170
Shah  RKDhingra  JKCarter  BLRebeiz  EE Paranasal sinus development: a radiographic study. Laryngoscope 2003;113 (2) 205- 209
PubMed Link to Article
Brown  WAMolleson  TIChinn  S Enlargement of the frontal sinus. Ann Hum Biol 1984;11 (3) 221- 226
PubMed Link to Article
Losee  JEAfifi  AJiang  S  et al.  Pediatric orbital fractures: classification, management, and early follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122 (3) 886- 897
PubMed Link to Article
Bansagi  ZCMeyer  DR Internal orbital fractures in the pediatric age group: characterization and management. Ophthalmology 2000;107 (5) 829- 836
PubMed Link to Article
Amirjamshidi  AAbbassioun  KSadeghi Tary  A Growing traumatic leptomeningeal cyst of the roof of the orbit presenting with unilateral exophthalmos. Surg Neurol 2000;54 (2) 178- 182
PubMed Link to Article
Ratilal  BCosta  JSampaio  C Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing meningitis in patients with basilar skull fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1) CD004884
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

933 Views
2 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have Osteoporosis?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference