<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Otolaryngology–Head &amp; Neck Surgery: Dermatology Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:56:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archotol.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archotol.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Use of Vascularized Muscle Flaps in the Healing of Compromised Wounds Comment on “The Impact of Pharyngeal Closure Technique on Fistula After Salvage Laryngectomy”Vascularized Muscle Flaps and Wound Healing </title>
      <link>http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1676505</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Genden EM. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;The article titled “The Impact of Pharyngeal Closure Technique on Fistula After Salvage Laryngectomy” by Patel et al is a retrospective review of 350 patients from 8 institutions, who underwent salvage laryngectomy after radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy. The authors stratified patients into 3 groups according to pharyngotomy closure technique. The closure types included (1) primary closure, (2) closure using a fasciocutaneous free flap, and (3) closure using a pectoralis myofascial onlay flap.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamaoto.2013.2765</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1676505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>